![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
![Exclamation :!:](./images/smilies/icon_exclaim.gif)
Moderator: F9K9
I did not know they made a module for our truck. I have not seen one for our application. Do you have a link?killian96ss wrote:Walbro pumps are also very good!
I'm sure there are more places to get them, but here is a link to FuelPumps.comHenryJ wrote:I did not know they made a module for our truck. I have not seen one for our application. Do you have a link?killian96ss wrote:Walbro pumps are also very good!
Are you talking about go-karts, shifter karts etc.?HenryJ wrote:Thanks! Are you using one?
All my Walbro experience is with Karting. They were a good choice there.
I see the AC Delco pump available for all the years I checked. The crew cab is not listed separately from what I have seen.Horsehammerr wrote:Rockauto lists Dephi FGO123 as the actual OEM for CREW CAB 4x4, $267.99. Their AC Delco pump does not list Crew Cab application.
Rockauto.com is a good place to look up numbers.Horsehammerr wrote:Does anyone have the part # for the fuel pump for '02 CC with steel tank ?
HenryJ wrote:Nice thought, but not an option. Look closer at where the module resides in relation to the cab. A quick look between the cab and bed shows mine to be partially behind the cab. Not only would you have to cut through a structural portion of the cab support structure, it would be futile as the module would not be under the cab. It would hit the pinch weld of the back and not come out.tomtk wrote:I am going to cut an access panel into the cab floor and have a friend in a Detroit sheet metal shop make me a bolt in cover for it to regain cab stiffness in the area.
I will be able to fold rear seat forward and remove plate and pull module up and out quickly.
Just as well as I can not imagine trying to get the electrical connections, retention ring and lines loose through a hole in the cab , behind the rear seat.
Dropping the driveshaft, draining the fuel and dropping the tank is not all that bad a job. After the fourth or fifth time it gets easier
Hope you guys don't learn the hard way about changing pumps and not the whole module. I have been there and done that. Thought I was really saving money...NOT. I just got the pleasure of repeating the job, over and over.
I learned my lesson a long time ago. Now I bite the bullet and buy a good complete module. Treated right by using the top half of the tank, good fuel and regular treatments of cleaner, they last another 100k miles like the stock one.
Just another opinion, and you know what else everyone has, so take it for what that is worth.
Couldn't agree more. I had to do mine last year. What sucked the most was I lived in an Apartment complex and had to have it done at a shop.HenryJ wrote:Don't risk buying one from NAPA. Their pumps are poor. Junk may be more appropriate.
Buy Genuine AC Delco. Check Rockauto for good pricing.
Spend a little more and do it once, or go cheap and replace it over and over.
That was the story I got too. It is not. My stock pump is AC. It is very close and the parts guy swears the Delphi bought AC Delco. I don't know about that. The AC Delco pumps were plug-n-play, the Delphi pump requires cutting the wires and splicing in a new connector. I don't like thatJaVeRo wrote:I put a Delphi FG0070 in my wifes 2001 crew. It was sold to me as being OEM.
Start saving your dues now. $350 with out planning for it can be a tough pill to swallow.fallvitals wrote:Can't wait till I join (insert sarcasm).
I had about 7/8 of a full tank. Murphys law says it always happens on a full tank. Mine is never under half, so It was inevitable.f9k9 wrote:...how full was the tank when the pump died?
I did. I used a 3/8" ID hose to siphon out a good 13 gallons or so. Two five gallon cans over filled and part of a six gallon can.Were you able to siphon off the fuel before dropping it?
I think so. It gave me a little more room to disconnect the fuel lines and electrical connectors.Did the BL help in anyway?
2" body lift on mine, so no rubbing and more clearance.JaVeRo wrote:Just curious if you looked at the evap hoses shown it the pictures in this threadand if they were rubbing.
I am feeling better about changing that connector now.Chevrolet fuel pump failures are a common and growing problem. These defective fuel pumps can cause a stalling condition or a no start problem.
This is most common on Chevrolet truck models from 1996 to 2003 model years. You can go on any automotive forum and see people discussing this far-reaching problem.
Replacement of the fuel pump is not a quick or easy job due to the fact that the pump is in tank mounted and the fuel pump is replaced as a unit. The replacement parts for the job are also not inexpensive.
To make matters worse, what I have seen are repeat failures of the replacement unit. I have experienced this myself and again I have seen it many a times on popular automotive repair forums.
The original Chevy pump motor has a life expectancy of about 15-20 years.
Running the vehicle out of fuel, which will actually run the pump in a dry state, can shorten this. Gasoline is a petroleum product and actually lubricates the inside of the fuel pump.
The more you run the vehicle low on fuel or out of fuel, the more damage will occur and the quicker the pump will fail.
When you buy the replacement parts from Delco, which is the recommended procedure. They will sell you a fuel pump module. This factory replacement unit also includes the fuel level gauge sender, hanger assembly and tank filter.
Most aftermarket replacement pumps just include the motor itself. This means that you just replace the motor and transfer over the used fuel pump stock, fuel sending unit, and hanger assembly. This process leaves more room for error and is also a large cause of repeat failures.
But I have experienced repeat failures, even when using the direct expensive replacement Delco fuel pump module. I found a technical service bulletin that addresses just this problem.
TSB wrote:The technical service bulletin that explains the cause of the repeat failure of the Chevy fuel pump replacement unit covers all years from 1996 to 2003 and includes all of the pickup trucks, Tahoe and suburban and their GMC counterparts such as the sierra and envoy. Oh and don't forget the Cadillac Escalade is also included.
The Chevrolet service bulletin states that the cause of the repeat failures is due to worn or damaged electrical connectors at the fuel pump assembly. When you get the Delco replacement parts it comes with a new connector on the fuel pump side.
The problem is the connector on the vehicle side of the harness. Chevrolet states that this connector needs to be replaced along with the fuel pump assembly.
Failure to replace the electrical connector on the harness side will cause an excessive voltage drop across the new fuel pump that over time will damage the new replacement part.
Replacement of the harness connector is a fairly simple operation and the parts are readily available from your GM dealer parts department.
With the cost and difficulty of the repair, it is wise to follow this technical service bulletin and take a few extra minutes to replace the connector. In my own personal experience I have had no comebacks since employing this new procedure.
Would it be worth doing this larger wire mod on a pump that is going off and then back on ? Could that be happening because of too low of power to the pump ? If this could help , can I get some more details on how you did this ?killian96ss wrote:Are you talking about go-karts, shifter karts etc.?HenryJ wrote:Thanks! Are you using one?
All my Walbro experience is with Karting. They were a good choice there.
I have a high volume 255 lph Walbro in my SS and a factory type 90 something lph Walbro in my 88 S10.
The 255 lph pump is a very popular pump for a wide range of performance cars from high hp importsto domestic race cars because it supports 700-800 hp and is very reliable.
![]()
I know a couple guys who run them in BMW's, Corvette's, and some factory type applications like Silverados etc. and they seem to hold up better than AC/Delco pumps.
From my experience with AC/Delco fuel pumps, they are actually pretty good pumps (about the same quality as Walbro pumps), and it seems like most of the failures are cause by high resistance in the wiring (undersized power and ground wires) which burn up the pumps and sometimes even the wiring and plugs inside the tank.
Whenever I put in a new fuel pump I also run some larger gauge power wires (spliced into the factory harness with their own fuse and hd relay) directly to the alternator, battery, or fuse box power terminal.
The stock harness still turns the fuel pump on and off while the spliced in power cables supply more voltage to the pump.
In some cases I have seen a 2-3 volt increase to the pump @ idle by doing this modification, although I'm more concerned about voltage as the rpms go up where I have seen the biggest problems occur.![]()
The other type of failure is the one we we alll know about (lack of lubrication from running the fuel tank too low).
I get on my wife all the time about this one.![]()
![]()
Walbro and AC/Delco are the only pumps I would use in any GM vehicle.![]()
Steve
No. The stock wire is big enough for the stock pump.Horsehammerr wrote:Would it be worth doing this larger wire mod on a pump that is going off and then back on ?
Yes. Due to the connector. Read the TSB above. The thin connector terminals are what they are blaming for the low voltage. That will not necessarily cause an intermittent failure. It can contribute to the pumps demise though.Could that be happening because of too low of power to the pump ?
No small to large offers less resistance than maintaining the same smaller diameter.Horsehammerr wrote:Won't going from small to large cause resistance in power flow.
Just the opposite. Going from small to large decreases pressure due the the increased volume.In liquid that will increase pressure, but reduce volume.
Water and electricity do work in similar ways. Your analogy is sound. Keep in mind the length of the run. A short neck down in size and back up offers little measurable resistance, just as a small increase in size offers little change as long as the length of that transition is short.What about with electricity?
That is what we were describing when referring to a new connector. It is indeed different and uses larger terminal contacts.Horsehammerr wrote:...I got the new connector installed. Sure looks like a lot stronger and beefier fitting.