Page 1 of 1
what do yall think (Jesse James)
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 10:57 am
by JERRY
Re: what do yall think
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 11:49 am
by Jim
He has a TV
show but I haven't seen any cars or trucks of his I like.
A sport bed would be nice.
He's more for the show(TV) than the go...he should stick with bikes.
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 11:57 am
by jeff024
i think it looks good im just not into slammed trucks seems pointless to me . and why would we need that long bed anyway
after we have been dealing with 4ft 6in
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 12:23 pm
by HenryJ
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 5:13 pm
by coffeedrnkr
I am all for lifted trucks, but I think that is awesome.
Though I would never drive it b/c with me driving it would be destroyed within a month I am so used to being able to hit things. If it was at my house I would put it in one of those inflatable bubbles for old cars and keep it there so I cant touch or scratch it.
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 5:55 pm
by Rusty
I seem to recall this came up once before and I still think it would be cool lifted with a dually conversion (with the right type wheels of course). Kind of like a miniature version of a 1 ton crewcab.
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 6:06 pm
by F9K9
Am trying to keep an open mind but, I think thet I have become my Dad.
Am over 50 and I don't "get it"
I know that there is a major following and I respect other's opinions but, I just don't "get it"
Also, do not comprehend the larger wheels and rubberband tires that cost much more than tires of older styles. Looks to me that the tire manufacturers are reaping the harvest on less product-more money
Have nothing against slamming or 22" wheels and a "base set of spinners" and tires from JC Whitney at $5,000 a set
I just think about KC's or Bad_ass's rig and think that the money could be better spent.
am stepping off soapbox and crawling under woodwork
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 6:09 pm
by Rusty
f9k9 wrote:Am trying to keep an open mind but, I think thet I have become my Dad.
Am over 50 and I don't "get it"
I know that there is a major following and I respect other's opinions but, I just don't "get it"
Also, do not comprehend the larger wheels and rubberband tires that cost much more than tires of older styles. Looks to me that the tire manufacturers are reaping the harvest on less product-more money
Have nothing against slamming or 22" wheels and a "base set of spinners" and tires from JC Whitney at $5,000 a set
I just think about KC's or Bad_ass's rig and think that the money could be better spent.
am stepping off soapbox and crawling under woodwork
Sounds like you "get it" better than I do! At least you seem to know some of the terminology. And I haven't hit the 50 mark yet.
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 6:33 pm
by jeff024
im only 34 and im not sure i get it (a truck )was ment to be a truck (a car) ment to be a car so whats the use in that truck besides looks but functions not there anymore , but im sure its not ment to just drive around everyday (just for looks a show truck) ok maybe i do get it
myself in the eye
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 6:33 pm
by Jim
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 6:47 pm
by jeff024
musta took some diggin to find that jim
Posted: Fri Dec 03, 2004 6:57 pm
by HenryJ
It is not so much the specific vehicle, but the way it is done.
I'm not into building a hydraulic low rider , but I am facinated by quality work, even if it is not something that I would do.
You have to admit that some rigs you can tell when they ran out of money. Like an interior that looks like it was super glued together, or painted stock wheels.
It is nice when the package is complete.