Where to get 4.11's or 4.56's for our IFS

Fitting oversize tires, raising and lowering, suspension modifications...

Moderator: F9K9

User avatar
quickbiker
Crew K Elite
Crew K Elite
Posts: 1575
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2002 6:01 pm
Location: VA
Contact:

Where to get 4.11's or 4.56's for our IFS

Post by quickbiker »

I know someone knows. I think Hobie may know from one of his ZR2 buddies. Where??? :?:
[size=75][url=http://outsideventure.com/s10crew/]01 S10 Crewcab - SAS'd[/url][/size]
User avatar
HenryJ
Admin K Elite
Admin K Elite
Posts: 12705
Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2002 9:14 pm
Location: Ontario, Oregon
Contact:

Re: Where to get 4.11's or 4.56's for our IFS

Post by HenryJ »

quickbiker wrote:I know someone knows.
Might be worth refreshing your memory with these threads:
What gears for 33" tires
Low gear questions-Hobbie?

"Speed doesn't kill, suddenly becoming stationary does." - Richard Hammond
"Speed is just a matter of Money - How fast do YOU want to go?"-Mechanic from Mad Max-
If at first you don't succeed - Don't take up Skydiving!
- ThunderII KE7CSK
User avatar
a2b
Mod K Elite
Mod K Elite
Posts: 1765
Joined: Wed Oct 02, 2002 11:20 pm
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

Post by a2b »

hmmm. i have seen them in magazines before...but i just let the local shop order whatever gears they came up with..i have 4.10's
[size=75] -HOBIE

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^| ||__\
| ##Budweiser ###### | ||''|"\,__.
|_...__...________ ====| |__|__|...]
"(@)'(@)""""**|(@)(@)******(@)I[/size]
User avatar
quickbiker
Crew K Elite
Crew K Elite
Posts: 1575
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2002 6:01 pm
Location: VA
Contact:

Post by quickbiker »

Yea, I guess 4.10's are the safest lowest gears to go with. That should keep me about what I am now with 31's. I see it may be just a tad better (lower) with 4.10's and 33's. :)
[size=75][url=http://outsideventure.com/s10crew/]01 S10 Crewcab - SAS'd[/url][/size]
User avatar
adrenalnjunky
Crew Elite
Crew Elite
Posts: 895
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2003 11:32 am
Location: West Monroe, Louisiana
Contact:

Post by adrenalnjunky »

bringing this thread back from the past ....

I'm looking at swapping gearing in my truck to either 3.73 or 4.10 --

Looking at Precision Gear's website - http://www.precisiongear.com/gmring.htm They make a 4.11 for the IFS, but a 4.10 for the rear. I know that different people callthe same ratio different things, (eg 4.105) Why would they call one a .11 , and the rear a .10? If I go with these would I be ok?

Also, looking at their RPM calculator,

http://www.precisiongear.com/pgtech_rpm.htm

My 3.42's on a 28 inch tall tire runs 2155RPM in overdrive at 75 mph. (Assuming a 1:1 ratio)
Swap numbers to a 31 inch tall tire, and 3.73's and you get 2122 RPM's - seems like the closest Ican get to stock settings. Theoretically I could swap tires and gears and my PCM wouldn't need to be reprogrammed for my speedometer to be correct (or close enough.)

and dropping to the 4.10's and 33's gives a 2192 RPM figure at 75 mph. [/url]
[size=75]Thanks, CHRIS
2000 S10 Blazer 4x4 4Dr. -- 2" PA BodyLift, Daystar Shackles, TB Crank, 1.75" Rear wheel spacers, Yakima roofrack, 30" BFG AT's.
1969 VW Bug -- airbagged and in pieces.
1962 VW Karmann ghia -- rusting over in the corner. "That's not a tool--that's a damn brick!"[/size]
User avatar
HenryJ
Admin K Elite
Admin K Elite
Posts: 12705
Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2002 9:14 pm
Location: Ontario, Oregon
Contact:

Post by HenryJ »

adrenalnjunky wrote:I'm looking at swapping gearing in my truck to either 3.73 or 4.10 --
My vote goes to the 4.10 and 31". It is nearly the same as the 3.73/29" tire combo , which is the best final ratio ,IMO.
Looking at Precision Gear's website - http://www.precisiongear.com/gmring.htm...Also, looking at their RPM calculator,http://www.precisiongear.com/pgtech_rpm.htm...(Assuming a 1:1 ratio)...
Don't forget that there are calculators on our website too : S-10Crewcab.com Calculators
And Detailed specifications which show that 3rd is 1:1 , overdrive is .70 ;)

"Speed doesn't kill, suddenly becoming stationary does." - Richard Hammond
"Speed is just a matter of Money - How fast do YOU want to go?"-Mechanic from Mad Max-
If at first you don't succeed - Don't take up Skydiving!
- ThunderII KE7CSK
User avatar
adrenalnjunky
Crew Elite
Crew Elite
Posts: 895
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2003 11:32 am
Location: West Monroe, Louisiana
Contact:

Post by adrenalnjunky »

Ok--but does anyone have a good explanation why their 7.25 ring is labeled a 4.11, and their 10 bolt 7.625 is listed as a 4.10 or does it make any difference?
[size=75]Thanks, CHRIS
2000 S10 Blazer 4x4 4Dr. -- 2" PA BodyLift, Daystar Shackles, TB Crank, 1.75" Rear wheel spacers, Yakima roofrack, 30" BFG AT's.
1969 VW Bug -- airbagged and in pieces.
1962 VW Karmann ghia -- rusting over in the corner. "That's not a tool--that's a damn brick!"[/size]
User avatar
quickbiker
Crew K Elite
Crew K Elite
Posts: 1575
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2002 6:01 pm
Location: VA
Contact:

Post by quickbiker »

No difference. That's like having a thrust washer .0221 instead of .0220. Not a big deal. Did that make any sense? :lol:
[size=75][url=http://outsideventure.com/s10crew/]01 S10 Crewcab - SAS'd[/url][/size]
User avatar
adrenalnjunky
Crew Elite
Crew Elite
Posts: 895
Joined: Sun Jul 27, 2003 11:32 am
Location: West Monroe, Louisiana
Contact:

Post by adrenalnjunky »

absolutely --- "Don't sweat the small stuff"
[size=75]Thanks, CHRIS
2000 S10 Blazer 4x4 4Dr. -- 2" PA BodyLift, Daystar Shackles, TB Crank, 1.75" Rear wheel spacers, Yakima roofrack, 30" BFG AT's.
1969 VW Bug -- airbagged and in pieces.
1962 VW Karmann ghia -- rusting over in the corner. "That's not a tool--that's a damn brick!"[/size]
User avatar
coffeedrnkr
Crew Elite
Crew Elite
Posts: 358
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 11:32 pm
Location: kansas
Contact:

Post by coffeedrnkr »

I was talking to a guy I know about switching gears and he said the front's are 4.11 so they are a little more than the rear so the front is pulling in 4wd and not being pushed. That was his theory.

In my opinion that is soo little of a difference that it wouldnt matter.
[size=75][url=http://s80.photobucket.com/albums/j162/coffeedrnkr15/]The Crazyblaze[/url]
d44/d60 5.13's, atlas 3.8
[/size]
User avatar
HenryJ
Admin K Elite
Admin K Elite
Posts: 12705
Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2002 9:14 pm
Location: Ontario, Oregon
Contact:

Post by HenryJ »

coffeedrnkr wrote:...the front's are 4.11 so they are a little more than the rear so the front is pulling in 4wd and not being pushed. That was his theory.
The theory sounds good but it is backwards with those ratios. the 4.10 is faster than the 4.11, so the rear would be pushing the front.
That would not be really helpful, but it is very little difference.

"Speed doesn't kill, suddenly becoming stationary does." - Richard Hammond
"Speed is just a matter of Money - How fast do YOU want to go?"-Mechanic from Mad Max-
If at first you don't succeed - Don't take up Skydiving!
- ThunderII KE7CSK
User avatar
coffeedrnkr
Crew Elite
Crew Elite
Posts: 358
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 11:32 pm
Location: kansas
Contact:

Post by coffeedrnkr »

Whoops, my bad I typed it wrong. thanks for the correction
[size=75][url=http://s80.photobucket.com/albums/j162/coffeedrnkr15/]The Crazyblaze[/url]
d44/d60 5.13's, atlas 3.8
[/size]
User avatar
KCustom
Crew Elite
Crew Elite
Posts: 301
Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2003 11:35 am
Location: Sand Springs OK
Contact:

gears

Post by KCustom »

I had 4.11 in the rear and 4.10 in the front of my 95 Blazer....I was told the same theory...front pulls more.
2003 Sonoma Crew Cab, Superlift 6", PA 2" BL, KMC XD Enduros, BF Goodrich 315-70-17s, Powerdyne SC, JBA wires,headers and catback, CAI, Crossdrilled & Slotted rotors, Prerunner bar W/ fogs, bed mount spare, Custom rear buckets...