Trans. gear ratios

Post by **HenryJ** » Tue Jul 08, 2003 4:44 pm

Just incase some one needs them-

HydraMatic 4L60E ratios

First gear = 3.059:1

Second gear = 1.625:1

Third gear = 1.000:1

Fourth gear = 0.696:1

Reverse = 2.294:1

quickbiker · Post by **quickbiker** » Tue Jul 08, 2003 7:03 pm

And what's the tcase ratio?

Warnoffroad · Post by **Warnoffroad** » Tue Jul 08, 2003 8:06 pm

I believe it's 1:3 or 3:1 however it goes

a2b · Post by **a2b** » Fri Jul 11, 2003 3:18 pm

quickbiker wrote:And what's the tcase ratio?

ready.......ready.......ready......

a whopping 2.63 to 1

thats sucks

AZS10Crew · Post by **AZS10Crew** » Fri Jul 11, 2003 3:25 pm

Hold onto your hats kids, we've got torque multiplication!

a2b · Post by **a2b** » Fri Jul 11, 2003 11:59 pm

so my crawl ratio went from 26 to 1

to

32 to 1

when i dropped to 4.10's

quickbiker · Post by **quickbiker** » Sat Jul 12, 2003 4:46 am

Now all ya need is dat atlas tcase. I suppose warn will be the first?

Mike H. · Post by **Mike H.** » Sat Jul 12, 2003 6:43 am

HenryJ wrote:Just incase some one needs them-

HydraMatic 4L60E ratios

First gear = 3.059:1

Second gear = 1.625:1

Third gear = 1.000:1

Fourth gear = 0.696:1

Reverse = 2.294:1

This has always bugged me, and they seem to do it in every vehicle. Why the heck would reverse need to be a higher ratio than 1st gear? It's not such a problem with automatics, but it always sucks with manuals. Burns the clutch while trying to position your boat/camper/trailer/etc. Why would anybody need to go faster backward than they do forward in first gear? To me, they should make reverse same as 1st gear, or lower.

Post by **HenryJ** » Sat Jul 12, 2003 6:59 am

Mike H. wrote:
HenryJ wrote:
Reverse = 2.294:1

This has always bugged me, and they seem to do it in every vehicle. Why the heck would reverse need to be a higher ratio than 1st gear? It's not such a problem with automatics, but it always sucks with manuals. Burns the clutch while trying to position your boat/camper/trailer/etc. Why would anybody need to go faster backward than they do forward in first gear? To me, they should make reverse same as 1st gear, or lower.

It is to reduce the amount of torque applied. The ring and pinnoin are not designed to have heavy loads applied to the back side.

Mike H. · Post by **Mike H.** » Sat Jul 12, 2003 7:13 am

Makes sense. Still sucks...... but makes sense.

a2b · Post by **a2b** » Sat Jul 12, 2003 8:48 am

HenryJ wrote:
Mike H. wrote:
HenryJ wrote:
Reverse = 2.294:1

This has always bugged me, and they seem to do it in every vehicle. Why the heck would reverse need to be a higher ratio than 1st gear? It's not such a problem with automatics, but it always sucks with manuals. Burns the clutch while trying to position your boat/camper/trailer/etc. Why would anybody need to go faster backward than they do forward in first gear? To me, they should make reverse same as 1st gear, or lower.
It is to reduce the amount of torque applied. The ring and pinnoin are not designed to have heavy loads applied to the back side.

aaaahhhhhhhhhhhh

Warnoffroad · Post by **Warnoffroad** » Sun Jul 13, 2003 7:29 pm

quickbiker wrote:Now all ya need is dat atlas tcase. I suppose warn will be the first?

I was looking at the atlas 300 but it's too thin so my drive shaft problem would only be worse. So ill just leave it up to chuck and have him put in a m-37. That way he can make one his custom mounts, and it will be very strong.

:Off topic: When I get a new t case, Ill be doing spring over axle up front and goin up to 12" leafs up front (right now I have 6" leafs). How big of a tire do you think I could fit with the extra 11"s? my goal was 39.

quickbiker · Post by **quickbiker** » Sun Jul 13, 2003 7:35 pm

Gee the last time I ran that lift I was doing like 44's.

Warnoffroad · Post by **Warnoffroad** » Sun Jul 13, 2003 7:42 pm

yea but want that one a toyota? My gay wheel wells are way to small for 44s

I want an f350 SD CC, anyone wanna buy one and trade me trucks

j/k

quickbiker · Post by **quickbiker** » Sun Jul 13, 2003 7:43 pm

Just chop them fenders up!

Warnoffroad · Post by **Warnoffroad** » Sun Jul 13, 2003 7:44 pm

Yea ppppp I dont need doors

and ill just remove my bed.

Justin · Post by **Justin** » Sun Jul 13, 2003 8:11 pm

diesel f-350 regular cab ok?

a2b · Post by **a2b** » Mon Jul 14, 2003 2:13 am

warnoffroad wrote:Yea ppppp I dont need doors and ill just remove my bed.

warn, if you do the SOA and you are willing to buy new bigger tires....why not go ahead an get after market fenders from glassworks, they are about 200 a peice and then you could put bigger tires on with the same lift

quickbiker · Post by **quickbiker** » Mon Jul 14, 2003 3:15 am

Here are some flares that some guy is gonna make: http://forum.zr2.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb ... =000003;p=

S-10CREWCAB.NET

Trans. gear ratios

Trans. gear ratios

Re: Trans. gear ratios

Re: Trans. gear ratios

Re: Trans. gear ratios