Tornado Air System

This is the place for all those mods

Moderator: F9K9

Joseph
Crew Elite
Crew Elite
Posts: 113
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 2:06 pm
Location: Quincy,il

Tornado Air System

Post by Joseph »

Whats up with this Tornado Air System? I've read from one source it's the greatest thing since sliced bread :lol: and heard from another it's no big deal :( . I think the $69 bucks is way to much+shipping of $12.95. I would be interested if someone can give a good reason to buy one :wink:. JH68
User avatar
seapahn
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 37
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 7:39 pm
Location: Madison, WI
Contact:

Post by seapahn »

My brother (who is a graduate aerospace/mechanical engineering student at UCLA) and I sit and laugh at their commercials sometimes!!! Especially when they say "it helps you make better horsepower"...



We are both convinced it's an absolute gimmick and a total crap. Worst of all, it will be a restriction when you need air most!!!! Don't you think engine manufacturers would have already thought of "spinning" the air for performance if it were so easy and would make their cars more economical and more powerful? Are we really supposed to believe engine designers and engineers are so dumb? hahahahahahaha



It's a lot like that ZMax crap. They REALLY get on my nerves with their lies. Even after all the truth came out about their product, I still see them running those misleading and horrible informercials. :twisted:
User avatar
Conman
Crew Elite
Crew Elite
Posts: 664
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 7:14 am
Location: Long Island, NY USA
Contact:

Post by Conman »

seapahn wrote:My brother (who is a graduate aerospace/mechanical engineering student at UCLA) and I sit and laugh at their commercials sometimes!!! Especially when they say "it helps you make better horsepower"...



We are both convinced it's an absolute gimmick and a total c##p. Worst of all, it will be a restriction when you need air most!!!! Don't you think engine manufacturers would have already thought of "spinning" the air for performance if it were so easy and would make their cars more economical and more powerful? Are we really supposed to believe engine designers and engineers are so dumb? hahahahahahaha



It's a lot like that ZMax c##p. They REALLY get on my nerves with their lies. Even after all the truth came out about their product, I still see them running those misleading and horrible informercials. :twisted:


Yeah if you see Zmax newer commercials, they had to bleep out some of the words cause it was mis-leading.......



As for the Tonado, a few mags did a test and no gains.



Con
[size=75]2007 Hummer H3 all Stock
Sold: 2004 Chevy Avalanche Z71 all Stock.
Sold: 2002 Chevy S10 Crew Cab ZR5 - Mods: Truxedo Bed Cover, APC and TYC Lights.[/size]
User avatar
Warnoffroad
Crew Elite
Crew Elite
Posts: 477
Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2003 6:04 pm
Location: Winter Springs Florida
Contact:

Post by Warnoffroad »

I didnt think that it would give you any HP. To me it looked more like something that would just block air from going in, and the all the wasted power it takes to spin it.
User avatar
Brad
Crew Elite
Crew Elite
Posts: 170
Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2003 8:45 pm
Location: Orient OH

Post by Brad »

I got one and think it makes the truck feel more peppy. I might put it on a chassis dyno this summer to see if it helps. I makes a little noise, kind of a whirling sound. I bought it cause Hot Rod says it works.



Brad
Freinds don't let freinds crank torsion bars.
User avatar
Warnoffroad
Crew Elite
Crew Elite
Posts: 477
Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2003 6:04 pm
Location: Winter Springs Florida
Contact:

Post by Warnoffroad »

Humm... lets us know I want to try to get as much "easy" HP as I can.
User avatar
HenryJ
Admin K Elite
Admin K Elite
Posts: 12705
Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2002 9:14 pm
Location: Ontario, Oregon
Contact:

Post by HenryJ »

I'm a bit skeptical still.



There is a guy in town the bracket races a V-8 Vega. He swears that it gained .05 sec and 10 mph in the quarter when he added the tornado.



He is pretty sharp and the car has been raced for over three years now , so He should know what it did.

He is running it on his tow rig too.



I am using the Helix Power tower right now. Not for the "vortex" effect , but because I wanted to raise the throttle body.

It was also to see if there was anything to all the claims of performance gains.

So far, nothing noticeable, MPG same.

"Speed doesn't kill, suddenly becoming stationary does." - Richard Hammond
"Speed is just a matter of Money - How fast do YOU want to go?"-Mechanic from Mad Max-
If at first you don't succeed - Don't take up Skydiving!
- ThunderII KE7CSK
Joseph
Crew Elite
Crew Elite
Posts: 113
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 2:06 pm
Location: Quincy,il

Post by Joseph »

I'll think the price could be lower. But, still interested in getting one. Thanks for the info. I'll try to make up my mine. JH68
User avatar
Warnoffroad
Crew Elite
Crew Elite
Posts: 477
Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2003 6:04 pm
Location: Winter Springs Florida
Contact:

Post by Warnoffroad »

Will the work with a T/B spacer :?:
User avatar
HenryJ
Admin K Elite
Admin K Elite
Posts: 12705
Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2002 9:14 pm
Location: Ontario, Oregon
Contact:

Post by HenryJ »

It fits inside the flexable air tube, so the spacer would not be affected.

Image

Here is the install instructions: Installation instructions



It is basically a piece of tin shaped like a pinwheel that you put inside the intake air flow.

Mor information here:Tornadoair



(I don't like the fact that they are so proud of the product that you can't find a picture of it ;) )

"Speed doesn't kill, suddenly becoming stationary does." - Richard Hammond
"Speed is just a matter of Money - How fast do YOU want to go?"-Mechanic from Mad Max-
If at first you don't succeed - Don't take up Skydiving!
- ThunderII KE7CSK
User avatar
mattfu
Crew
Crew
Posts: 56
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 1:53 pm
Location: Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada

Post by mattfu »

not trying to overide anyones opinion here, but i am a power generation engineer for the canadian government, which means i am a fuel/air and combustion expert, the only scientific way of knowing if the tornado is doing anything is to do a proper flue gas analsis (measuring burned and unburned fuel coming out the exhaust) , the only thing i have to add is that where you install this piece is critical. some installers put it right after the airbox or near k&n filter. this now means that the air swirls up to the MAF sensor, then the screen distorts any frictional resistance that was lost. installing directly after the MAF will aid in combustion ,provided you have adaquate fuel atomization (clean injectors) . anyway i ordered one of these tornados aug 20/06 but i havnt recieved it yet. when it comes i will take it to work and do some REAL tests on fuel combustion equipment and let you all know what happens.
User avatar
HenryJ
Admin K Elite
Admin K Elite
Posts: 12705
Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2002 9:14 pm
Location: Ontario, Oregon
Contact:

Post by HenryJ »

Keep us informed. Carefully document fuel mileage before as well as after, costs, and any measurement of performance that is repeatable and documentable that you may have available. Give it time for the "new mod" to wear off so that you can form a less biased opinion.

Bear in mind that ours is a dry intake. The fuel atomization takes place in the last few inches from the injectors at the intake port into the combustion chamber. The swirl there is created by the "vortec" head design.

I think that the Tornado , could work...BUT on a wet system, and more specifically a carbureted vehicle where fuel atomization is poor.

"Speed doesn't kill, suddenly becoming stationary does." - Richard Hammond
"Speed is just a matter of Money - How fast do YOU want to go?"-Mechanic from Mad Max-
If at first you don't succeed - Don't take up Skydiving!
- ThunderII KE7CSK
User avatar
Steve2003
Crew Elite
Crew Elite
Posts: 643
Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2005 8:07 pm

Post by Steve2003 »

Brule, I have a tornado I just took out of my truck, I saw a program on tv that claimed they didn't work, infact there study showed they caused worse gas milage. If you want I can ship it it to you and you can test it.
[size=75][color=blue]2003 S-10 crew cab[/color][/size]
[size=75][color=red]6in superlift[/color][/size]
User avatar
HenryJ
Admin K Elite
Admin K Elite
Posts: 12705
Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2002 9:14 pm
Location: Ontario, Oregon
Contact:

Post by HenryJ »

Steve2003 wrote:...If you want I can ship it it to you and you can test it.
Thanks, but no thanks. I have done my share of testing those mods that I feel have potential. I just haven't been convinced in this case. I even have a local racer here who runs them on his tow rig and race car. He runs the super pro bracket with his Vega. This is a sub 9 second 1/4 mile car. But carbureted. He swears by them and claims both mileage and performance gains.

I tested the Vararam since I could see some potential in the design. That didn't work out for my set-up.
All this testing may have led to the early demise of my precat. My truck is "in it's happy place". I would have to be convinced there are some pretty significant gains to try another mod right now.
If anything I am considering taking steps backward :D

"Speed doesn't kill, suddenly becoming stationary does." - Richard Hammond
"Speed is just a matter of Money - How fast do YOU want to go?"-Mechanic from Mad Max-
If at first you don't succeed - Don't take up Skydiving!
- ThunderII KE7CSK
User avatar
F9K9
Mod K Elite
Mod K Elite
Posts: 6183
Joined: Sun May 30, 2004 12:26 pm
Location: London, Kentucky, United States

Post by F9K9 »

HenryJ wrote:................If anything I am considering taking steps backward :D
Any hints, since I have pretty much echoed your set up?
[size=75][b]"For those who have fought for it, [i][color=red]FR[/color][color=white]EE[/color][color=blue]DOM[/color][/i] has a taste that the protected will never know."
[url=http://www.naxja.org/forum/showthread.php?t=73349]GUIDE TO SEARCHING. [i] (Some of the forum software is different but, it has helped me a lot.)[/i][/url][/b]
[b]"Those who don't know history are destined to repeat it." Edmund Burke[/b][/size]
User avatar
HenryJ
Admin K Elite
Admin K Elite
Posts: 12705
Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2002 9:14 pm
Location: Ontario, Oregon
Contact:

Post by HenryJ »

f9k9 wrote:...Any hints...
Don't sell your stock airbox. The FIPK is on "strike two" in my book. One more problem and I'm back to the stock modded airbox.

"Speed doesn't kill, suddenly becoming stationary does." - Richard Hammond
"Speed is just a matter of Money - How fast do YOU want to go?"-Mechanic from Mad Max-
If at first you don't succeed - Don't take up Skydiving!
- ThunderII KE7CSK
User avatar
F9K9
Mod K Elite
Mod K Elite
Posts: 6183
Joined: Sun May 30, 2004 12:26 pm
Location: London, Kentucky, United States

Post by F9K9 »

Thanks, I have kept checking it since Steve's and your failure of that bracket. I am one up or "down" on you two. I had the Airaid system before I went to the FIPK. I would have stayed with the Airaid but was never able to find suitable heat shield material readily available. I used several different plastic and aluminum sources.

My stock airbox is closeby. :D
[size=75][b]"For those who have fought for it, [i][color=red]FR[/color][color=white]EE[/color][color=blue]DOM[/color][/i] has a taste that the protected will never know."
[url=http://www.naxja.org/forum/showthread.php?t=73349]GUIDE TO SEARCHING. [i] (Some of the forum software is different but, it has helped me a lot.)[/i][/url][/b]
[b]"Those who don't know history are destined to repeat it." Edmund Burke[/b][/size]
User avatar
mattfu
Crew
Crew
Posts: 56
Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 1:53 pm
Location: Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada

Post by mattfu »

i agree henry , i think these tin wonders are going to prove effective for carborated engines and not so much for us, as for the guys who are hell bent that these gadgets reduce fuel economy ... absolutely possible , if you installed it at the airbox you would cause swirl up to the MAF then more turbulance from there to the throttle body then the "vortec" effect near the injectors would attempt to swirl the air again (maybe im wrong here, vortec principal=swirling air , right? ) , all these changes plus the fact that the vortec effect might just swirl the air in the opposite direction that the tornado is , could create a overall flow restriction, thus reducing fuel economy. now that ive used 100 words to say nothing, i have averages over 10 tanks of gas , each specific to city/hwy/ac on or off and so on, so soon i will post what i got for changes from stock to k&n cold air to addition of the tornado, allthough it will piss off a few of you as all my numbers will be in metric , but averages are averages.
User avatar
HenryJ
Admin K Elite
Admin K Elite
Posts: 12705
Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2002 9:14 pm
Location: Ontario, Oregon
Contact:

Post by HenryJ »


"Speed doesn't kill, suddenly becoming stationary does." - Richard Hammond
"Speed is just a matter of Money - How fast do YOU want to go?"-Mechanic from Mad Max-
If at first you don't succeed - Don't take up Skydiving!
- ThunderII KE7CSK
RickZRX
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 41
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Mojave Desert

Post by RickZRX »

Just wait until it frags & throws a handful of scrap metal down the intake. EVERY test of these things has shown them to be complete snake oil.
[size=75]Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam.

Nihil curo de ista tua stulta superstitione.[/size]
User avatar
crew cab sonoma
Crew Elite
Crew Elite
Posts: 238
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2004 2:21 am
Location: Chattanooga, TN

Post by crew cab sonoma »

when you think about it, there are simply too many bends and turns in the intake tract, for the air to maintain any "swirl" generated by such a device.

whats going to happen to the swirling air when it hits a partially open throttle blade, or even one
thats wide open??? clearly, either would tend to disrupt the effect...

not to mention making the turns and bends, plus making the transition from the TB to an open plenum. and how would this spiraling air divide itself amog the cylinders???

and last, but not least, what do you think is going to happen to spiraling air, as it attempts to enter, and travel down a rectangular shaped intake runner, like ours???

something to think about, before spending your money on such a device....
[size=75]Lee

01 Sonoma Crew Cab 2.21 60ft. 10.24 @ 66.5 mph (1/8mi.)(SOLD)
00 Sonoma Ext. Cab 4WD. front axle removed, Torsen diff. W4M pcm. 2.10 60ft. 9.64 @ 71.0 mph (1/8 mi.)[/size]
User avatar
killian96ss
Crew K Elite
Crew K Elite
Posts: 2669
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2003 11:53 am
Location: Sacramento, California

Post by killian96ss »

The Tornado is just a gimmick like the spiral TB spacers. :wink: Neither one actually works. :(

Steve
User avatar
crew cab sonoma
Crew Elite
Crew Elite
Posts: 238
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2004 2:21 am
Location: Chattanooga, TN

Post by crew cab sonoma »

agreed. spend your money elsewhere....
like on those fuel line magnets.... :lol:
[size=75]Lee

01 Sonoma Crew Cab 2.21 60ft. 10.24 @ 66.5 mph (1/8mi.)(SOLD)
00 Sonoma Ext. Cab 4WD. front axle removed, Torsen diff. W4M pcm. 2.10 60ft. 9.64 @ 71.0 mph (1/8 mi.)[/size]
RickZRX
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 41
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Mojave Desert

Post by RickZRX »

crew cab sonoma wrote:agreed. spend your money elsewhere....
like on those fuel line magnets.... :lol:
Ya mean gasoline isn't magnetic??? :shock: No wonder I couldn't clean my main jets with my magnet on a stick! :wink:
Of course :idea: that explains why the compass in my ZR5 doesn't constantly point at my gastank.....
[size=75]Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam.

Nihil curo de ista tua stulta superstitione.[/size]
User avatar
HenryJ
Admin K Elite
Admin K Elite
Posts: 12705
Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2002 9:14 pm
Location: Ontario, Oregon
Contact:

Post by HenryJ »

roadrunner wrote:... I do have the tornado thingy's on 4 different vehicles. They do work. Not large but definitely measureable mpg increases on all 4. In the range of .5 to 1.5 mpg.
Looking For A Miracle: We Test Automotive 'Fuel Savers'

"Speed doesn't kill, suddenly becoming stationary does." - Richard Hammond
"Speed is just a matter of Money - How fast do YOU want to go?"-Mechanic from Mad Max-
If at first you don't succeed - Don't take up Skydiving!
- ThunderII KE7CSK
User avatar
brandons4door
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 30
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2008 8:10 am
Location: MICHIGAN

Post by brandons4door »

thanks for the link. its a good read.
User avatar
roadrunner
Crew K Elite
Crew K Elite
Posts: 1267
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 5:39 pm
Location: NW KS

Post by roadrunner »

Interesting read. I keep records of all my gas through all my vehicles and stand by my increase statements. CC=+.5mpg, 98 Buick=+1.5mpg, 90 Buick =+1.0mpg, and 92Caravan=+.75mpg. These averages are for over two years in all cases much more in some.
I also stand by my statement "increased HP=increased MPG (as long as fuel useage remains constant) unless driver wastes it in driving habits". On that line interesting notes are first I too have friends who race circle track and the tracks they race on have outlawed the tornado devices and this from the link Brule posted:
TornadoFuelSaver
Tornadofuelsaver.com, $70
THEY CLAIM: "... an increase in gas mileage--up to 28%!!!" "Dynometer [sic] testing demonstrates an increase of 4-13 horsepower."
BOTTOM LINE: Normally, we want less turbulence in the intake, not more.

Note the HP increase. Nuff said. I'll continue to use mine and smile all the way to the bank.
2001 CC LS, pewter, stock, 4.3,Wait4meperformance, CFM throttle blade, Helix throttle body spacer, 4spd auto, 3button electric 4x4 shift, heavy duty factory suspension, Bilsteins, 1" rear wheel spacers, skid plates.
User avatar
HenryJ
Admin K Elite
Admin K Elite
Posts: 12705
Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2002 9:14 pm
Location: Ontario, Oregon
Contact:

Post by HenryJ »

roadrunner wrote:...from the link Brule posted:
TornadoFuelSaver
Tornadofuelsaver.com, $70
THEY CLAIM: "... an increase in gas mileage--up to 28%!!!" "Dynometer [sic] testing demonstrates an increase of 4-13 horsepower."
BOTTOM LINE: Normally, we want less turbulence in the intake, not more.
They claim does not mean they have to prove it.
Caveat Emptor.

I am sure much of the testing I did lead to the early demise of my precat. Many of these gimmicks produce increased emissions that can foul a converter.

Keep in mind that very small changes in mileage can be attributed to normal wear, tire pressure, weather conditions, fuel composition, etc.
Any price you pay for a gimmick is money probably better invested in fuel for the tank. It takes time to recover the initial purchase price, and the benefits may be learned out by then.
If it makes you happy, do it.

"Speed doesn't kill, suddenly becoming stationary does." - Richard Hammond
"Speed is just a matter of Money - How fast do YOU want to go?"-Mechanic from Mad Max-
If at first you don't succeed - Don't take up Skydiving!
- ThunderII KE7CSK
User avatar
roadrunner
Crew K Elite
Crew K Elite
Posts: 1267
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 5:39 pm
Location: NW KS

Post by roadrunner »

Yeah Brule. I noticed and disproved the 28% "claim" as well what I was hoping you'd notice there also was the dyno-testing actual gain of 4-13 hp. Increased hp=increased mpg given no increase in fuel consumption. Given the longevity of my personal testing (every tankful since purchase of each vehicle) I am satisfied with my results. As I've stated in other posts given the amount of fuel I use and miles I drive per year even a .5mpg increase adds up in a hurry to a not to be ignored $ figure. And I too can track the "seasonal" blend changes in fuels etc. 8)
2001 CC LS, pewter, stock, 4.3,Wait4meperformance, CFM throttle blade, Helix throttle body spacer, 4spd auto, 3button electric 4x4 shift, heavy duty factory suspension, Bilsteins, 1" rear wheel spacers, skid plates.